|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李伟强,汤 明,宋彩荣,等.群体认同与社会评价对消极群体情绪的影响[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2020,42(1):113-118.
 LI Wei-qiang,TANG Ming,SONG Cai-rong,et al.Effects of Group Identification and Social Evaluation on Negative Groups Emotion[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2020,42(1):113-118.
点击复制

群体认同与社会评价对消极群体情绪的影响(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2020年1期
页码:
113-118
栏目:
教育心理学
出版日期:
2020-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of Group Identification and Social Evaluation on Negative Groups Emotion
文章编号:
1008-0627(2020)01-0113-06
作者:
李伟强汤 明宋彩荣吴旭秋袁 博
(宁波大学 心理学系暨研究所, 浙江 宁波 315211)
Author(s):
LI Wei-qiang TANG Ming SONG Cai-rong WU Xu-qiu YUAN Bo
( Dept. & Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China )
关键词:
群体内疚群体愤怒道德评价能力评价
Keywords:
group guilt group-based anger moral evaluation ability evaluation
分类号:
G40-02
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以网络中有关大学生的负面新闻报道为研究材料,考察了面对群体负面信息,群体认同与社会评价对群体情绪的影响。结果发现:不同社会评价只影响低群体认同个体的群体内疚强度。具体而言,正性能力评价和负性道德评价对低群体认同个体的群体内疚具有促进作用;高群体认同个体的群体愤怒始终高于低群体认同个体。结果表明,高群体认同个体的群体内疚不易受社会评价的影响;而低群体认同个体在受到负性道德评价和正性能力评价时,群体内疚体验更强烈;群体愤怒只受群体认同强度影响。
Abstract:
This study used the negative news reports on college students collected from the Internet to investigate the influence of group identification and social evaluation on group-based emotions. The results showed that: different social evaluations only affect the group-based guilt intensity of individuals with low group identity, and, specifically, positive ability evaluation and negative moral evaluation can promote the group-based guilt of individuals with low group identity; and individuals with high group identity are easier to get enraged than those with low group identity. These suggested that group-based guilt of individuals with high group identity is not easily affected by social evaluation whereas group-based guilt experience is stronger when individuals with low group identity received negative moral evaluation and positive ability evaluation, and that group-based anger is only affected by the intensity of group identity

参考文献/References:

[1] SMITH E R. Chapter 13-Social Identity and Social Emotions: Toward New Conceptualizations of Prejudice[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc, Affect Cognition & Stereotyping, 1993: 297-315.
[2] 唐辉一. 群体共享情绪放大效应及其机制研究[D].宁波: 宁波大学, 2015: 28-30.
[3] HARTH N S, LRACH C W, KESSLER T. Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour:different emotions predict distinct intentions.[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013(34):18-26.
[4] 费显政, 王涯薇. 社会负面事件中情绪的作用机理研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(7): 1052-1061.
[5] 殷融, 张菲菲, 王元元, 等. 群体内疚: 界定、心理机制、行动倾向及干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 1058–1068.
[6] MILINSKI M, SEMMANN D, KRAMBECK H J. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’[J]. Nature, 2002, 415(6870): 424-426.
[7] FISKE S T, XU J, CUDDY A C, et al. (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1999(3): 473-489.
[8] LERNER J S, KELTNER D. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice[J]. Cognition and Emotion,, 2000(14): 473-493.
[9] FISKE S T, CUDDY A J C, GLICK P, et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competenceand warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902.
[10] FISKE S T, CUDDY A J, GLICK P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 200711(2): 77-83.
[11] LEACH C W, ELLEMERS N, BARRETO M. Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups[J]. Pers Soc Psychol, 2007, 93(2): 234-249.
[12] 任冰洁. 基于内群体积极评价指标:道德评价重要性的验证性研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2014: 37-42.
[13] 马艳丽, 胡正明. 在线评论的矛盾性影响因素和形成机理研究[J]. 云南社会科学, 2013(5): 78-81.
[14] CEHAJICCLANCY S, EFFRON D A, HALPERINE, et al. Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures [J]. Pers Soc Psychol, 2011, 101(2): 256-270.
[15] GUNN G R, WILSON A E. Acknowledging the skeletons in our closet: the effect of group affirmation on collective guilt, collective shame, andreparatory attitudes[J]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 2011(11):1474-1487.
[16] SMITH E R, SEGER C R, MACKIE D M. Mackie. “Can Emotions Be Truly Group Level? Evidence Regarding Four Conceptual Criteria[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2007, 93(3): 431-46.
[17] FERGUSON M A, BRANSCOMBE N R. The socialpsychology of collective guilt [M]. Collective emotions:Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology. 2014: 251-265.
[18] HOGG M A. Social Identity Theory: Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory[M]. Springer International Publishing, 2016: 1781-1783.
[19] DUMONT K, WALDZUS S. Group-based guilt and reparation in the context of social change[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2014, 44(4): 331-341.
[20] JELIC M, BIRUSKI D C, AJDUKOVIC D. Predictors of collective guilt after the violent conflict[J]. Collegium Antropologicum, 2013(37): 1-10
[21] ZEBEL S, DOOSJE B, SPEARS R. The threat of those who “understand”: ways in which out‐groupsinduce guilt[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 39(1): 154-162.
[22]SCHORI-EYAL N, TAGAR M R, SAGUY T, et al. The benefits of group-based pride: Pride can motivate guilt in intergroup conflicts among high glorifiers[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2015(61): 79-83.
[23] 权珊珊. 群际威胁对认知转换的影响:群体认同的调节作用[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2016: 31-33.
[24] 张书维. 群际威胁与集群行为意向:群体性事件的双路径模型[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(12): 1410-1430.
[25] VAN Z M, SPEARS R, LEACH C W. Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: doesrelevance of group identity influence how people copewith collective disadvantage?[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 47(2): 353-372.
[26] DOOSJE B, ELLEMERS N, SPEARS R. Perceivedintragroup variability as a function of group status and identification[J]. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 1995, 31(5): 410-436.
[27] 吕丽. 群体内疚与群体羞耻的差异研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2017: 44-47.
[28] TAUBER S, ZOMEREN M V. Refusing intergrouphelp from the morally superior: How one group’s moral superiority leads to another group’s reluctance to seek their help[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48(1): 420-423.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
?收稿日期:2019-08-20基金项目:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“新移民情境下师生冲突的发生机理与调控策略研究(BFA160036)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-16