|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]仲彦鹏,刘剑虹*.计划单列市公办普通高校学费定价指数分析——以深圳、青岛、宁波3市为例[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2019,41(1):41-045.
 ZHONG Yan-peng,LIU Jian-hong.A Case Study of Tuition Pricing Index of Public Normal Universities in the Separately-listed Cities in the State Planning[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2019,41(1):41-045.
点击复制

计划单列市公办普通高校学费定价指数分析——以深圳、青岛、宁波3市为例(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第41卷
期数:
2019年1期
页码:
41-045
栏目:
高等教育
出版日期:
2019-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Case Study of Tuition Pricing Index of Public Normal Universities in the Separately-listed Cities in the State Planning
文章编号:
10080627(2019)01-0041-05
作者:
仲彦鹏1刘剑虹2*
(1. 宁波大学 教师教育学院,浙江 宁波 315211;2. 湖州师范学院 党委办公室,浙江 湖州 313000)
Author(s):
ZHONG Yan-peng1 LIU Jian-hong2
(1. College of Teachers Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; 2. CPC Committee Office, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou 313000, China)
关键词:
-
Keywords:
index method social living standards cost of higher education running tuition pricing
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在高校学费水平上调呈常态化的时期,找到一个合理的指标来科学指导、评价和监控学费定价,成为高等教育分担新的课题。以深圳市、青岛市和宁波市24所公办普通高校为研究对象,通过分析PQLFI指数和CHEFI指数,审视其学费定价调整情况。分析得出,社会居民生活水平、高等教育办学成本中学费的占比逐年下降;在政府强大的财政支持下,社会居民对高校学费已有一定负担能力,这促进了高等教育办学质量的提升。但学费的调整仍需体现不同类型高校间的差异,同时做好过程监督,为社会提供优质高等教育服务。
Abstract:
The normal rise of tuition of higher learning institutions calls for a reasonable indicator to scientifically guide, evaluate and monitor the tuition pricing, which has become a subject of wide interest in the financial share of higher education. This paper conducted a case study of the PQLFI and CHEFI from 24 public colleges and universities in Shenzhen, Qingdao and Ningbo to examine the recent years’ tuition adjustment status of colleges and universities. It found that the proportion of tuition fees in the social living standards and higher education costs decreases year on year, and that the strong government’s fiscal support has enhanced residents’ affordability to college tuition fees, thus promoting the improvement of higher education quality. It also found that the adjustment of tuition fees still needs to reflect the differences among a variety of colleges and universities while better process supervision is further needed to provide quality education to the society

参考文献/References:

[1].国家教育委员会, 国家计划委员会, 财政部. 高等学校收费管理暂行办法[EB/OL].(1996-12-16) http://old.moe.gov.cn// publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_621/201001/81884. html.
[2].沈超儿, 晏成步. 指数法视角下的地方公办普通高校学费定价分析——以宁波市为例[J]. 宁波教育学院学报, 2017, 19 (4): 14-19.
[3].约翰?斯通. 高等教育财政: 问题与出路[M]. 沈红, 李红桃, 译. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2006: 171-172.
[4].王善迈. 论高等教育的学费[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2000(6): 24-29.
[5].吴开俊, 范先佐. 高校学费依据教育培养成本收取的悖论[J]. 高等教育研究, 2007(1): 26-30.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划“浙江省公办高校学校调整指数研究”(2016QN021)*通讯 收稿日期:2018-02-15
作者简介:刘剑虹(1959-),男,浙江临安人,研究员,主要
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-11