|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]江春华,胡赤弟*.行业组织对美国法学教育的影响研究[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2018,40(6):61-066.
 JIANG Chun-huaHU Chi-di.Impacts of Industry Organizations on American Legal Education[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2018,40(6):61-066.
点击复制

行业组织对美国法学教育的影响研究(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第40卷
期数:
2018年6期
页码:
61-066
栏目:
高等教育
出版日期:
2018-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impacts of Industry Organizations on American Legal Education
文章编号:
10080627(2018)06-0061-06
作者:
江春华1胡赤弟2*
(1. 宁波大学 教师教育学院,浙江 宁波 315211;2. 宁波大学 区域高等教育研究中心,浙江 宁波 315211)
Author(s):
JIANG Chun-hua1HU Chi-di2
( 1. College of Teachers Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; 2. Research Center of Regional Higher Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China )
关键词:
-
Keywords:
industry organizations American law education industrial self-regulation double subject mode impacts
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
行业组织的形成有其历史必然性,对美国法学教育产生的影响是深刻久远、历久弥新的。在市场主导机制作用下,美国律师协会和美国法学院协会在共同互动、相互监督中,从法学院招生、办学、教学到毕业就业,都提出了具体的标准要求,且持续强化,促进了法学教育专业化,也提高了法律人才培养质量,逐步控制了美国法学教育的入口和出口。行业组织对美国法学教育的影响是全过程、全方位的,并且持续贯彻、落到实处,推进了行业自律,也为美国法学教育卓越做出了巨大历史贡献。
Abstract:
The emergence of industry organizations is a historical inevitability, which has produced profound and far-reaching impacts on American legal education. Under the market-oriented mechanism, the American Bar Association and the Association of American Law School in mutual interaction and supervision gradually established the complete standards and requirements to the enrollment, running, teaching, graduation and employment of law schools, increasingly fostering the professionalization of legal education and the quality of legal talent cultivation, and manipulating the entry and exit of legal education in the United States. These industry organizations have exerted thorough, all-round, sustainable and substantial impacts on American legal education, thus making great historical contributions to the excellence of legal education in the United States

参考文献/References:

[1].ALFRED Z.REED. Training for the Public Profession of the Law: Historical Development and Principal Contemporary Problems of Legal Education in the United States[M]. New York: Kessinger Publishing, 1921.
[2].罗伯特·史蒂文斯. 法学院——美国法学教育百年史:19世纪50年代至20世纪80年代[M]. 李立丰, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017.
[3].Department of Law, New York University. Annual Announcement of Lectures[R]. New York University Press, 1858-59: 10-11.
[4].教育部师范教育司. 教师专业化的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2001.
[5].克拉克·克尔. 大学的功用[M]. 陈学飞, 等, 译. 南昌: 江西教育出版社, 1993: 78.
[6].QUINTIN JOHNSTON, DAN HOPSON. Lawyers and Their Work[M]. Jr.New York:The Bobbs-Merrill Company,Inc. 1967: 43.
[7].American Bar Association. Review of Legal Education[R]. New York: American Bar Association Journal, 1979: 63-64.
[8].ALFRED Z.REED. Present-Day Law Schools in the United States and Canada[M]. New York,The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 1928: 598.
[9].LANGDELL, CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS.“Harvard Celebration Speeches.”3 Law Quarterly Review[R].Cambridge, 1887: 124.
[10].Association of American Law School. Association of American Law School Proceedings[R]. New York: Association of American Law School, 1968: 54.
[11].JOEL SELIGMAN. The High Citadel: The Influence of the Harvard Law School[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978:43.
[12].胡晓进. 美国律师协会的法学院设置标准[J].高教发展与评估, 2011,27(6): 10-15, 133.
[13].罗俊明. 以“法”治法学院——介绍美国律师协会《法学院合格标准章程》[J]. 国外法学, 1988(4): 62-65.
[14].JOHN S. BRUBACHER, WILLIS RUDY. Higher Education in Transition: A History of American Colleges and Universities [M]. Transaction Publishers, 2007: 3.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-06-20*通讯作者简介:胡赤弟(1963-),男,浙江宁波人,教授/博士,主要研究方向:高等教育。E-mail:afuse2013@qq.com法学教育法学院
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-30