|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈柏华,汪小静.英语教学大纲发展比较研究[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2017,39(5):92-099.
 CHEN Bo-hua,WANG Xiao-jing.A comparative Study of English Teaching Syllabuses from the perspective of Structure and Multiplicity[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2017,39(5):92-099.
点击复制

英语教学大纲发展比较研究(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第39卷
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
92-099
栏目:
课程与教学论
出版日期:
2017-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative Study of English Teaching Syllabuses from the perspective of Structure and Multiplicity
文章编号:
10080627(2017)05-0092-08
作者:
陈柏华汪小静
(宁波大学 教师教育学院,浙江 宁波 315211)
Author(s):
CHEN Bo-hua WANG Xiao-jing
( College of Teachers Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China )
关键词:
-
Keywords:
structural syllabus task-based syllabus multi-syllabus
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
英语教学大纲是英语教学的指导性纲要,先后经历结构大纲、程序大纲、过程大纲及任务大纲的发展历程。通过对其特点、内容选择、排序标准及其优缺点的分析,发现英语教学大纲呈现新旧大纲多元融合、语言形式—意义—功能并重、分析与综合大纲并举的发展趋势,这对教材开发、英语教学及教师专业发展带来新的启示。
Abstract:
English teaching syllabuses have undergone the development of structural syllabus, procedural syllabus, process syllabus and task syllabus, as guidance to English teaching. This study compared the characteristics, contents selection, ordering standards and advantages of these syllabuses, suggesting that they took the trend of multiple integration, linguistic form, meaning and function, analytic and synthetic approaches presented in the old and new syllabuses. These findings bring fresh insights into teaching material development, English teaching and teachers’ professional development

参考文献/References:

[1].程晓堂, 孙晓慧. 英语教材分析与设计[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2011: 29.
[2].WILKINS D A. Notional syllabus[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.
[3].WHITE R V. The ELT curriculum[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
[4].LONG M H, Crookes G. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design [J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1992, 26(1): 27-56.
[5].KUMARAVADIVELU B. Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod[M]. Brisbane: Jacaranda, 2006.
[6].PITTMAN G. Teaching structural English[M]. Brisbane: Jacaranda, 1964: 179.
[7].RICHARDS J C, RODGERS R S. Approaches and methods in language teaching [M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2008.
[8].BLOOMFIELD L. Language[M]. London: George Allen& Unwin Ltd, 1935: 23-28.
[9].PRABHU N S. Second language pedagogy[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987: 69-70.
[10].HYMES D. On Communicative competence[M]// PRIDE J B, HOLMES J . Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972: 269-293.
[11].HALLIDAY M A K. Language as social semiotic[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978:16-20.
[12].WIDDOWSON H G. Directions in the teaching of discourse[M]// BRUMFIT, JOHNSON. The Communicative approach to language teaching[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000: 19-60.
[13].CANDLIN C N. Towards task-based language learning[M]// CANDLIN C N, MURPHY D, Lancaster practical papers in English language education: language learning tasks. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987(7): 5-22.
[14].BREEN M. Process in syllabus design[M]// BRUMFIT C. General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1984.
[15].RICHARD J C. Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central and backward Design[J]. RELC Journal, 2013, 44(1): 20-26.
[16].LARSEN-FREEMAN D, LONG M H. An introduction to second language acquisition Research[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000: 299-320.
[17].ELLIS R. Task-based language learning and teaching[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003:9-10.
[18].BATSTONE R. Language form, task-based language teaching, and the classroom context[J]. English Language Teaching Journal, 2012 (4): 459-466.
[19].SKEHAN P, BEI X Y, Li Q. The task is not enough: processing approaches to task-based performance[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2012(2): 170-187.
[20].ROBINSON P. Task-based language teaching: a review of issues[J]. Research in Language Studies, 2011, 61(Suppl.): 1-36.
[21].ELLIS R. Focus on form: A critical review[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2016, 20(3): 422-429.
[22].NUNAN D. Second language teaching and learning[M]. Boston: Heinle Publishers, 1998: 27.
[23].NUNAN D. Designing tasks for the communicative classroom[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2000:40-41.
[24].何安平. 外语教学大纲.教材.课堂教学设计与评估[M]. 广州: 广东教育出版社, 2001: 8-17.
[25].LONG M. Focus on form in task-based language teaching[M]// R D LAMBERT, E SHOHAMY. Language policy and pedagogy. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2000: 191–96.
[26].CALVERT M, SHEEN Y. Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2015, 19(2): 226–244.
[27].中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育英语课程标准[S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2011: 3-4.
[28].Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and the National Governors Association (NGA).Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts[S]. 2010: 36-39.
[29].SHIRAI Y, JUFFS A. Introduction: convergence and divergence in functional and formal approaches to SLA[J]. Second Language Research, 2017, 33(1): 3-12.
[30].VALEO A, SPADA N. Is there a better time to focus on form? teacher and learner views[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 2016(2): 314-316.
[31].文秋芳. 认知语言学与二语教学[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2013: 44-45.
[32].龚亚夫. 英语教育的价值与基础英语教育的改革[J]. 外国语, 2014(6): 8-12.
[33].ELLIS R. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2005(27): 141-172.
[34].HOLME R. Cognitive linguistics and the second language classroom[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 2012(1): 6-24.
[35].PATTEN B V. Why explicit knowledge can not become implicit knowledge[J]. Foreign Language Annual, 2016, 49(4): 650-657.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:宁波大学人文社科专项项目“微课视角下教材文本再构研究”(XPYB14005);宁波大学校重点教研项目(801504262)第一 收稿日期:2017-02-11基金项目:宁波大学人文社科专项项目“微课视角下教材文本再构研究”(XPYB14005);宁波大学校重点教研项目(801504262)第一作者简介:陈柏华(1974-),男,湖南株洲人,教授/博士,主要研究方向:英语课程与教学论。E-mail:chenbohua@nbu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-20