|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘 余,李雪平*,何 丹.保研夏令营的教育不公平现象及优化策略[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2017,39(5):43-047.
点击复制

保研夏令营的教育不公平现象及优化策略(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第39卷
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
43-047
栏目:
高等教育
出版日期:
2017-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
文章编号:
10080627(2017)05-0043-05
作者:
刘 余李雪平*何 丹
(西华师范大学 学前与初等教育学院,四川 南充 637000)
Author(s):
-
关键词:
-
Keywords:
summer camp for candidates of postgraduates educational injustice educational stratification cultural capital differences
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
保研夏令营是近几年各高校抢夺优质研究生生源的一种举措,但高校对夏令营的申请条件及最终录取几乎偏向于名校学生,这一行为无疑剥夺了普通高校学生通过保研夏令营成为研究生的机会。保研夏令营中所呈现出的研究生入学机会不公平现象主要在于教育资源差异、教育分层、名校特权与文化资本差异这几大因素。改变这一局面,亟需发挥教育被视为社会平衡器的作用,以学生自身努力为主,规范高校特权为辅,使研究生招生机制的运行更加行之有效。
Abstract:
Colleges and universities are inclined to organize summer camps for candidates of graduate education to recruit high-quality graduate students, but the criteria and admission to camps are biased in favor of those from the so-called elite schools, which deprived the ordinary college students of opportunities to become a candidate in summer camps. This mainly results from the differentiated educational resources, educational stratification, elite privilege and cultural capital differences. To tackle these problems, it is vital for higher learning institutions to really play the role of a social balancer, give significant weights to students’ own efforts and downplay the privileges of colleges and universities, so as to work out an equal and efficient graduate enrollment mechanism

参考文献/References:

[1].刘力畅. 保研夏令营: 是“战场”还是“乐园”[N]. 中国教育报, 2011-08-18(02).
[2].“清华大学2015年生命科学与基础医学夏令营”通知[EB/OL]. (2015-05-15).http://yz.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/ yjszs/ 8550/index.html.
[3].上海交通大学高等教育研究院2016级硕士研究生招生夏令营[EB/OL]. (2015-03-31). http://gse.sjtu.edu.cn/education/ admissions/878.htm.
[4].北京大学2016年光华管理学院“全国优秀大学生夏令营”通知[EB/OL]. (2016-04-27). http://www.gsm.pku.edu.cn/ graduate/index.html.
[5].刘献君. 论高等学校定位[J]. 高等教育研究, 2003,24(1): 24-28.
[6].徐娟. 我国弱势高校的发生机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013: 46.
[7].王伟宜. 高等教育规模扩张与各阶层子女入学机会变迁研究[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2010(4): 120-130.
[8].朱家德. 论转型社会中受高等教育权的特权属性——基于社会分层与高等教育互动关系的分析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2009(1): 22-27.
[9].周文辉, 李明磊. 基于高校调查的研究生培养质量保障机制研究[J]. 教育研究, 2013(3): 59-65.
[10].章仙踪. 十八高校“组团”互推研究生[N]. 中国教育报, 2011-05-23(05).
[11].魏玉梅. 全面建成小康社会目标下中国西部高等教育入学机会公平研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016: 3.
[12].国务院. 统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案[EB/OL]. (2015-11-05). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-11/ 05 /content_2960898.htm.
[13].李培林, 李强, 马戎. 社会学与中国社会[C]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2008: 278.
[14].段丽华. 教育公平: 制度视域研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2015: 48.
[15].劳凯声. 教育机会平等: 时间反思与价值追求[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2011(2): 5-15. Educational Unfairness in Summer Camps for Candidates of Graduate Education and Correcting Strategies
[16].LIU Yu, LI Xue-ping, HE Dan
[17].(College of Preschool and Primary Education , China West Normal University, Nanchong 637000, China)
[18].Abstract: Colleges and universities are inclined to organize summer camps for candidates of graduate education to recruit high-quality graduate students, but the criteria and admission to camps are biased in favor of those from the so-called elite schools, which deprived the ordinary college students of opportunities to become a candidate in summer camps. This mainly results from the differentiated educational resources, educational stratification, elite privilege and cultural capital differences. To tackle these problems, it is vital for higher learning institutions to really play the role of a social balancer, give significant weights to students’ own efforts and downplay the privileges of colleges and universities, so as to work out an equal and efficient graduate enrollment mechanism.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-06-15*通讯作者简介:李雪平(1967-),男,四川巴中人,教授,主要
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-20