|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张 敏.标准设定的大学英语听力成就测试探讨[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2015,37(6):116-119.
 ZHANG Min.ZHANG Min[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2015,37(6):116-119.
点击复制

标准设定的大学英语听力成就测试探讨(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2015年6期
页码:
116-119
栏目:
本科教学改革
出版日期:
2015-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
ZHANG Min
文章编号:
10080627(2015)06-0116-04
作者:
张 敏
(三峡大学 外国语学院,湖北 宜昌 443002)
Author(s):
ZHANG Min
(School of Foreign Languages, Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)
关键词:
-
Keywords:
Standard setting listening ability assessment validity
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
有效的语言测试能够对分数进行有意义的解释、公平的使用。标准设定是测试使用的重要环节,依据它所做的决策会对学生产生不同程度的影响。本文通过回顾标准设定的概念及意义、标准设定的方法及其评价,借鉴一些测试实践中标准设定方法的运用,分析是否能将其用于大学英语听力课程评估,以期进一步完善当前的课程评估体系。
Abstract:
Meaningful score and fair use can be achieved if the test validity is guaranteed. As an indispensable process of assessment use, standard setting would exert impact on students to a varied degree. This paper reviewed the concept, function, method and evaluation of standard setting. It focused on the method practiced in tests to explore the possibility of its application to college English listening achievement test for the improvement of current curriculum assessment system

参考文献/References:

[1].BACHMAN, L. F. Building and supporting a case for test use[J]. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2005, 2: 1-34.
[2].CIZEK,G. J., BUNCH, M. B. and KOONS, H. Setting performance standards: contemporary methods[J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2004, 4: 31-50.
[3].KANE, M. Criterion Bias in Examine Centered Standard Setting: Some Thought Experiments[J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1998, 17(1): 23-30.
[4].岳喜腾,张雨强. 基于课程标准的学业成就评价:韦伯模式之研究[J]. 全球教育展望, 2011, 10: 79-85.
[5].BACHMAN, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M]. Oxford University Press. 1990.
[6].TOGNOLINI, J. and STANLEY, G. 基于标准的评核:教育领域人力资本和能力提升的工具与方法[J]. 考试研究, 2010, 2: 4-20.
[7].American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing[S]. American Psychological Association. 1990.
[8].漆书青,周骏,张青华. 用信息函数法对标准参照测验作质量分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, (1): 34-39.
[9].罗莲. 汉语分级测试分数线划分研究[J]. 语言文字应用, 2012 (3): 117-125.
[10].李珍、辛涛、陈平. 标准设定:步骤、方法与评价指标[J]. 考试研究, 2010, (2): 83-95.
[11].Council of Europe. A Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment[M]. Cambridge University Press. 2001.
[12].TANNENBAUM, R. J. and WYLIE, E. C. Linking English- Language Test Scores Onto the Common European Framework of Reference: An Application of Standard-Setting Methodology [EB/OL].(2008-06). https://www.ets.org /Media/ Research/pdf/ RR-08-34.pdf.
[13].Cambridge ESOL. Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice [EB/OL]. (2013-01). http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/ 22695-principles-of-good-practice.pdf.
[14].北京语言大学汉语水平考试中心“HSK改进工作”项目组. 汉语水平考试(HSK)改进方案[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2007(2): 126-135.
[15].汪存友,余嘉元. 标准参照测验中标准设定的聚类分析法[J]. 南京师大学报, 2010(1): 103-108.
[16].BACHMAN, L. F. and PALMER, A. S. Language Testing in Practice[M]. Oxford University Press. 1996.
[17].杨慧中,桂诗春. 制定亚洲统一的英语语言能力等级量表[J]. 中国外语, 2007(2): 34-37.
[18].彭康洲. 基于测试使用论证的听力理解任务效度研究[D]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2010: 48-54. A Study of Standard Setting in College English Listening Achievement Test

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-06-25作者简介:张敏(1982-),女,湖北洪湖人,讲师,主要
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-10-21