|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]何诗意,陶志琼*.两种媒体暴力观比较[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2015,37(1):22-025.
 HE Shi-yi,TAO Zhi-qong.The Comparison from Two Kinds of the Interpretation of Media Violence[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2015,37(1):22-025.
点击复制

两种媒体暴力观比较(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2015年1期
页码:
22-025
栏目:
教育心理学
出版日期:
2015-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Comparison from Two Kinds of the Interpretation of Media Violence
文章编号:
10080627(2015)01-0022-04
作者:
何诗意陶志琼*
(宁波大学 教师教育学院,浙江 宁波 315211)
Author(s):
HE Shi-yi TAO Zhi-qong
(College of Teachers Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
关键词:
-
Keywords:
Conception of media violence pessimism rationalism enlightenment
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
媒体暴力观是在媒体暴力对儿童产生何种影响的争议中产生的。尼尔·波兹曼的《童年之死》一书中体现的是悲观主义媒体暴力观,大卫·帕金翰的《童年的消逝》一书中所体现的是理性主义媒体暴力观。本文通过对这两种不同的媒体暴力观的比较分析,获得让我们正确看待媒体暴力的启示:媒体暴力不是导致少年犯罪的唯一因素;管制责任的履行既在家长又在儿童;教育是减少媒体暴力负面影响的重要手段。
Abstract:
The perspective of media violence came into being in the disputes over impacts of media violence on children. Neil M. Postman held pessimistic perspective of media violence in his book “After the Death of Childhood”, while David Pakinghanm held rational perspective in his book” The Disappearance of Childhood” . This study focus on a comparative view of these perspectives, thus suggesting that media violence is not the only factors leading to juvenile delinquency for which parents and children both have to bear regulatory responsibility, and that education is considered as a point of penetration to reduce negative impacts form media violence.

参考文献/References:

[1].尼尔·波兹曼. 童年的消逝[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社,2011.
[2].大卫·帕金翰. 童年之死[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社,2011.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-08-08*通讯作者简介:陶志琼(1968-),女,四川达州人,教授,主要
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-01-12