|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]罗照盛,李 哲,叶宝娟.大学生课堂参与问卷的编制与现状调查[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2014,36(3):1-007.
 LUO Zhao-sheng,LI Zhe,YE Bao-juan.Upon the Status of Questionnaire and College Student Engagement in Class[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2014,36(3):1-007.
点击复制

大学生课堂参与问卷的编制与现状调查(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第36卷
期数:
2014年3期
页码:
1-007
栏目:
教育心理学
出版日期:
2014-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Upon the Status of Questionnaire and College Student Engagement in Class
文章编号:
10080627(2014)03-0001-07
作者:
罗照盛李 哲叶宝娟
(江西师范大学 心理学院,江西 南昌 330022)
Author(s):
LUO Zhao-sheng LI Zhe YE Bao-juan
(School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
关键词:
-
Keywords:
college students behavioral engagement cognitive engagement affective engagement questionnaire development
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了编制大学生课堂参与问卷,首先以文献研究为基础,结合结构式访谈,将大学生课堂参与确定为行为参与,认知参与和情感参与三个维度;并编制了大学生课堂参与预测问卷。对551名大学生进行了施测,验证性因素分析结果表明,大学生课堂参与问卷的模型结构与数据拟合良好。通过对α系数、分半信度、重测信度和结构效度的检验,表明大学生课堂参与问卷具有较好的信效度。调查结果表明,大学生课堂参与存在显著的年级差异和专业差异。该研究表明大学生课堂参与问卷是研究大学生课堂参与问题的一个有效工具。
Abstract:
This study investigated 551 college students with the self-compiled questionnaire (CSECQ) and the structured interview to examine the three dimensions of college students’ engagement in class: behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement and affective engagement. Its confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the construct of CSECQ fits with the data. The examination of α coefficient, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity proved that the CSECQ as an effective tool provided satisfactory reliability and validity. It found that there was significant difference of grade and major in college student engagement in class

参考文献/References:

[1].梁国瑞. 两成大学生从不提问[N]. 广州日报, 2012-05-17
[2]. (A16).
[3].ASTIN A W. Involvement the cornerstone of excellence[J]. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1985, 17(4): 35-39.
[4].KUH G D. Assessing what really matters to student learning inside the national survey of student engagement[J]. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2001, 33(3): 10-17.
[5].ASTIN A W. Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education[J]. Journal of college student personnel, 1984, 25(4): 297-308.
[6].NEWMANN F. Student engagement in academic work: expanding the perspective on secondary school effectiveness[J]. Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice, 1991: 58-76.
[7].WAXMAN H C, WALBERG H J. Effective teaching: current research[M]. Berkeley: McCutchan Pub Corp, 1991: 257-276.
[8].NEWMANN F M. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools[M]. New York: Teachers College Press, 1992: 2-3.
[9].CONNELL J P. Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span[J]. The Self inTtransition: Infancy to Childhood, 1990: 61-97.
[10].CONNELL J P, WELLBORN J G. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes [J]. 1991, 22: 43-47.
[11].孔企平. “学生投入”的概念内涵与结构[J]. 外国教育资料. 2000(2): 72-76.
[12].KONG Q P, WONG N Y, LAM C C. Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct[J]. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2003, 15(1): 4-21.
[13].罗晓燕, 陈洁瑜. 以学生学习为中心的高等教育质量评估—美国 NSSE“全国学生学习投入调查”解析[J]. 比较教育研究,2007, 10(7):50-54.
[14].朱红. 高校学生参与度及其成长的影响机制——十年首都大学生发展数据分析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2011(6): 35- 43.
[15].胡定荣. 回顾与反思: 二十世纪课堂教学中学生主体参与的研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2002, 22(5): 40-44.
[16].孔企平. 数学教学过程中的学生参与[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2003: 15.
[17].FINN J D. Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils[J]. American Educational Research Journal, 1992, 29(1): 142-162.
[18].MARSH H W, MUTH?N B, ASPAROUHOV T, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching[J]. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009, 16(3): 439-476.
[19].郑雪. 中学生心理健康教育[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2001: 190.
[20].D T S. Patters of Participation in classroom interaction: girls and boys on-compliance in a Greek high school[J]. Linguistics and Education. 2003, 14(1): 123-141.
[21].KENNEDY E. A multilevel study of elementary male black students and white students[J]. The Journal of Educational Research, 1992, 86(2): 105-110.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-02-25第一作者简介:罗照盛(1971-),男,江西吉安人,教授,主要研究方向:心理统计与测量。E-mai:luozs@126.com表5 年级的单因素方差分析 平方和 df 均方 F P 行为参与 组间 1501.396 3 750.698 21.088** .000 组内 11605.103 346 35.598 总数 13106.498 349 认知参与 组间 79.383 2 39.691 3.710* .026 组内 3487.590 346 10.698 总数 3566.973 349 情感参与 组间 85.869 2 42.935 7.882** .000 组内 1775.748 346 5.447 总数 1861.617 349 注:** P<0.01;* P<0.05,下同。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-05-15