|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]梅松竹,冷 平.教育质量监测试题的评价与反思[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2013,35(2):5-8.
 MEI Song-zhu,LENG Ping.Assessment and Introspection on Educational Quality Monitoring Items[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2013,35(2):5-8.
点击复制

教育质量监测试题的评价与反思(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2013年2期
页码:
5-8
栏目:
课程与教学论
出版日期:
2013-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment and Introspection on Educational Quality Monitoring Items
作者:
梅松竹1冷 平2
1. 北京师范大学 数学科学学院,北京 100875;2. 淮北师范大学 数学科学学院,安徽 淮北 235000
Author(s):
MEI Song-zhu1 LENG Ping2
1. School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. College of Mathematical Science, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 235000, China
关键词:
基础教育试题评价质量监测
Keywords:
academic achievement test item evaluation quality monitoring
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
-
摘要:
教育质量监测试题的质量关系到基础教育质量监测的科学性与权威性。评价认为,教育质量监测试题在思想与立意、目的与功能、结构与形式、指标与属性等方面具有一定优势,但也存在一致性难以兼顾、科学性论证缺位、利害性不易权衡的不足。针对其不足,提出拓展一致性分析、加强科学性论证和寻求利害性平衡的建议与策略,为我国的考试改革和教育质量监测提供重要借鉴。
Abstract:
The quality of educational quality monitoring items is of significant scientificity and authority. It is assumed that the items be favorably characteristic of such qualities as thought and conception, goal and function, construct and form, index and attribute, but unfortunately with deficient inconsistency, insufficient scientific demonstration, and vague efficacy assessment. This paper aims to accordingly explore workable strategies to strengthen the consistency, scientificity and efficiency of the items that will contribute much to the test reform and educational quality monitoring in China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 崔允漷,王少非,夏雪梅. 基于标准的学生学业成就评价[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008.
[2] OSTERLIND S J. Constructing test items:Multiple-Choice, Constructed-Response, Performance, and Other Formats[M]. New York:Kluwer Academic, 1998:11.
[3] RORBERT L LINN,NORMAN E,GRONLUND,国家基础教育课程改革“促进教师发展与学生成长的评价研究”项目组译. 教学中的测验与评价[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003:28.
[4] 雷新勇. 基于标准的教育考试—命题、标准设置和学业评价[M]. 上海:上海科技出版社,2011:13.
[5] ANDERSON L W,KRATHWOHL D R. A taxonomyfor learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M]. Abridged Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.2001:58.
[6] 廖平胜. 考试学原理[M]. 武汉:华中师范大学出版社, 2003:9.
[7] W. JAMES POPHAM. The merits of measurement-driven instruction[J].The Phi Delta Kappan, 1987, 68(9):679-682.
[8] CYNTHIA B,SCHMEISER,CATHERINE J. WELCH. Test development[M]//R L BRENNAN. Educational Measurement. 4th Ed. Praeger:American Council on Education,2006: 7.
[9] 臧铁军. 考试评价分析与诊断基础与务实[M]. 北京:首都师范大学出版社,2011:49-50.
[10] KANE M T. Validation[M]//R L BRENNAN. Educational Measurement.4th Ed. Praeger:American Council on Education, 2006:21.
[11] NORMAN E, GRONLUND, C KETTH WAUGH. 学业成就评测[M]. 杨涛,边玉芳,译. 第9版. 北京:教育科学出版社,2011:48.
[12] 美国教育研究协会,美国心理学协会,全美教育测量协会,主编,教育与心理测试标准[M]. 燕娓琴,谢小庆,译. 沈阳:沈阳出版社,2003:42.
[13] NORMAN L. WEBB. Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states [Z].Washington DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999:11.
[14] 教育部基础教育质量监测中心. 中心简介[EB/OL]. (2008- 03-25)[2012-11-20]. http://www.eachina.org.cn/eac/zxjj.htm.
[15] 张雨强. 开放题编制的理论与技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2006:7.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-03-10