|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郑东辉,叶盛楠.高校课堂教学评价现状与需求调查 ——基于浙江省N大学的报告[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2013,35(1):58-65.
 ZHENG Dong-hui,YE Sheng-nan.An Investigation on the Current College Class Teaching Assessment[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2013,35(1):58-65.
点击复制

高校课堂教学评价现状与需求调查 ——基于浙江省N大学的报告 (PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2013年1期
页码:
58-65
栏目:
高等教育
出版日期:
2013-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Investigation on the Current College Class Teaching Assessment
作者:
郑东辉叶盛楠
宁波大学 教师教育学院,浙江 宁波 315211
Author(s):
ZHENG Dong-hui YE Sheng-nan
Faculty of Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
关键词:
课堂教学质量教学评价调查
Keywords:
class teaching qualityassessmentinvestigationm
分类号:
G640
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
运用问卷调查法,对浙江省N大学1076名学生和368名教师进行课堂教学评价现状与需求的调查,结果发现:师生在评价目的、评价内容、评价方式和评价结果处理方面的现实感受与理想状态存在较大差距,学生评教危机四伏,岗位和学科影响教师对课堂教学评价的各种判断。与此相应,建议学校构建包涵“为了改进、多元主体、分类评价、全程参与和基于证据”元素的课堂教学评价体系;针对不同学科或专业和年级研制相应的学评教工具,加强过程监控,科学处理和及时反馈二次学评教结果;还专业的教学评价权给教师,并为教师的教学评价提供专业和技术支持。
Abstract:
This study questionnaired 1076 college students and 368 teachers selected from N universities in Zhejiang Province to survey to current class instruction assessment and challenges involved. The results indicated that differences significantly exist in assessment objectives, contents, modes, and application; students are faced with challenges in assessment; and teachers' posts and disciplines exert certain effects upon their judgment of assessment. It, thus, proposed that a proper assessment system must be streamlined from the perspectives of pluralistic subjectivities, assorted evaluation, formative and evidence-based supervision to design discipline- and grade-oriented assessing tools and promptly feedback the assessment results. Besides, professional assessment rights must be returned to teachers, and special and technical support must be provided for instructional assessment.

参考文献/References:

[1] BIRENBAUM M. New insight into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment[M]// SEGERS M,DOCHY F,CASCALLAR E,(EDS.). Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers,2003:25.
[2] 戚业国,杜英. 教育价值的多元与教育评价范式的转变[J].华东师范大学学报:教育科学版,2011(2):11-18.
[3] 蔡敏,张丽. 大学生参与教师教学评价的调查研究[J]. 高等教育研究,2005(3):69-73.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-01-10