|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郭远兵,黄朝云,郭小安.马基雅维利主义人格量表的信、效度分析[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2012,34(4):68-70.
 GUO Yuan-bing,HUANG Chao-yun,GUO Xiao-an.On the Reliability and Validity of Machiavellianism Personality Scale[J].JORNAL OF NINGBO,2012,34(4):68-70.
点击复制

马基雅维利主义人格量表的信、效度分析(PDF)
分享到:

《宁波大学学报》(教育科学版)[ISSN:1008-0627/CN:33-1214/G4]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2012年4期
页码:
68-70
栏目:
教育心理学
出版日期:
2012-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Reliability and Validity of Machiavellianism Personality Scale
作者:
郭远兵1黄朝云2郭小安3
1. 武汉体育学院 体育教育学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2. 武汉大学 中南医院,湖北 武汉430071; 3. 华中科技大学 马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉 430074
Author(s):
GUO Yuan-bing1 HUANG Chao-yun2 GUO Xiao-an3
1. Physical Education Dept., Wuhan Inst. of P. E., Wuhan 430079, China; 2. Dept. of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071 China; 3. Marxism Dept., Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
关键词:
马基雅维利主义人格量表信度效度
Keywords:
Machiavellianism personality scale reliability validity
分类号:
G444
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为考察马基雅维利主义人格量表(MPS)在大学生群体中的适用性,以481 名武汉市大学生为被 试,对MPS 进行因素分析和效、信度检验,结果显示:(1)项目分析后保留16 个项目,探索性因素分析 抽取4 个因素,各因子及项目归属与原问卷一致,4 个因子可解释总变异的52.064%。(2)验证性因素分 析显示4 因素模型拟合良好;MPS 总分与各因子和人格特质、操纵策略相关显著。(3)内部一致性信度 为0.727-0.831,重测信度为0.715-0.837。据此认为:MPS 中文版信、效度良好。
Abstract:
The article was designed to survey the reliability and validity of the Machiavellianism Personality Scale (MPS) through investigating 481 college students with the MPS. The results showed that: (1) Through item analysis and exploring factor analysis, the final Chinese Version of MPS contained 16 items and 4 subscales could explain 52.064% of the total variances; (2) The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the revised MPS had good construct validities, significantly related with personality traits and manipulation tactics; and (3) The Cranach’s coefficients of the scales were 0.727-0.831, with the test-retest reliabilities being 0.715-0.837. It was thus concluded that the MPS had good reliability and validity.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郭远兵,黄朝云,王兵,等. 马基雅维利主义人格及相关研 究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(11):1049- 1051.
[2] CHRISTIE R, GEIS F. Studies in Machiavellianism [M]. New York, USA: Academic Press, 1970: 388-400.
[3] ROGERS R S, SEMIN G R. Mach V: An improved scoring based on a triad choice model [J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1973, 27(1): 34-40.
[4] GEOS F L, MOON T H. Machiavellianism and deception [J]. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1981, 41(4): 766- 775.
[5] DAAHLING J J, WHITAKER B G, LEVY P E. The Development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale [J]. Journal of management,2008,35(2): 219-257.
[6] 钱铭怡,武国城,朱荣春,等. 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中 国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订[J]. 心理学报,2000,32(3):317-323.
[7] 郭远兵,黄朝云,佘双好,等. 操纵策略量表的修订及在大 学生中的信效度研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2010,19(10):940-942.
[8] ANASTASI A, URBINA S. Psychological testing [M]. 7th Ed. New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc,1997: 121-138.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-02-10 基金项目:国家社科基金青年项目(10CZZ018) 第一作者简介:郭远兵(1980-),男,湖北嘉鱼人,讲师/博士生,主要研究方向:人格心理学。E-mail:gyb0715@yahoo.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-07-10